Child Custody
Translate Child Custody from English to Spanish
Translation of Child Custody, with examples. More about free online translation into Spanish of Tutela and other legal terms is available here.
- Tutela
- Patria potestad
- Legal English Translation
Browse
You might be interested in these references tools:
Resource | Description |
---|---|
Child Custody in the Dictionary | Child Custody in our legal dictionaries |
Related topics | Browse topics from the World Wiki Encyclopedia of Law |
Browse the Legal Thesaurus | Find synonyms and related words of Child Custody |
Legal Maxims | Maxims are established principles that jurists use as interpretive tools, invoked more frequently in international law |
Legal Answers (Q&A) | A community-driven knowledge creation process, of enduring value to a broad audience |
Related topics | Child Custody in the World Encyclopedia of Law |
What is Child Custody?
Vocabularies (Semantic Web Information)
Resource | Description |
---|---|
Topic Map | A group of names, occurrences and associations |
Topic Tree | A topic display format, showing the hierarchy |
Sitemap Index | Sitemap Index, including Taxonomies |
https://legaldictionary.lawin.org/child-custody | The URI of Child Custody (more about URIs) |
Resources
See Also
Illegitimacy; Gay and Lesbian Rights; Family Law; Parent and Child.
Related Case Law
troxell v. granville, 120 s. ct. 2054 (2000).
Further Reading
arditti, j. a. (1991). “child support noncompliance anddivorced fathers: rethinking the role of parental involvement.” journal of divorce and remarriage 14:107-120.
bartlett, k. t. (1999). “child custody in the 21st century:how the american law institute proposes to achieve predictability and still protect the individual child’s best interests.” willamette law review 35:467-476.
bobroff, r. (2000). “the survival of grandparent visitationstatutes.” clearinghouse review 34:284-288.
bruch, c. s. (1988). “and how are the children? the effects of ideology and mediation in child custody lawand the children’s well-being in the united states.” international journal of law and the family 2:106-126.
buser, p. j. (1991). “the first generation of stepchildren.”family law quarterly 25:1-18.
chambers, d. l. (1990). “stepparents, biologic parents, and the law’s perception of ‘family’ after divorce.” in divorce reform at the crossroads, ed. s. d. sugarman and h. h. kay. new haven, ct: yale university press.
charlow, a. (1987). “whose child is it anyway? the bestinterests of the child and other fictions.” yale law and policy review 5:267-290.
clark, h. h., jr. (1988). the law of domestic relations in the united states, 2nd edition. st. paul, mn: west publishing.
czapanskiy, k. (1989). “child support and visitation: rethinking the connections.” rutgers law journal 20:619-665.
dudley, j. r. (1991). “exploring ways to get divorced fathers to comply willingly with child support agreements.” journal of divorce and remarriage 14:121-135.
elrod, l. d. and ramsay, s. h. (2001). “high-conflictcustody cases: reforming the system for children- conference report and action plan.” family law quarterly 34:589-606.
erlanger, h. s.; chambliss, e.; and melli, m. s. (1987).”participation and flexibility in informal processes: cautions from the divorce context.” law and society review 21:585-604.
goldstein, j.; freud, a.; and solnit, a. j. (1979). beyond the best interests of the child, 2nd edition. new york: free press.
More Further Reading
grillo, t. (1991). “the mediation alternative: process dangers for women.” yale law journal 100:1545-1610.
kelly, j. b., and lamb, h. e. (2000). “using child development research to make appropriate custody and access decisions for young children.” family and conciliation courts review 38:297-311.
maccoby, e. e.; buchanan, c. m.; mnookin, r. h.; anddornbusch, s. m. (1993). “postdivorce roles of mothers and fathers in the lives of their children.” journal of family psychology 7:24-38.
maccoby, e. e., and mnookin, r. h. (1993). dividing thechild. cambridge: harvard university press.
melli, m. s. (1993). “toward a restructuring of custodydecision making at divorce: an alternative approach to the best interests of the child.” in parenthood inmodern society, ed. j. m. eekelaar and p. sarcevic. dordrecht, netherlands: martinus nijhoff.
melli, m. s.; brown, p. r.; and cancian, m. (1997). “childcustody in a changing world: a study of postdivorce arrangements in wisconsin.” university of illinois law review 1997:773-800.
milne, a., and folberg, j. (1988). “the theory and practice of divorce mediation: an overview.” in divorce mediation, ed. j. folberg and a. milne. new york: guilford.
mnookin, r. h. (1975). “child custody adjudication: judicial functions in the face of indeterminacy.” law and contemporary problems 39:226-293.
mnookin, r. h., and kornhauser, l. (1979). “bargaining in the shadow of the law: the case of divorce.” yale law journal 88:950-997.
pearson, j., and thoennes, n. (1988). “divorce mediationresults.” in divorce mediation, ed. j. folberg and a. milne. new york: guilford.
sapone, a. i. (2000). “children as pawns in their parents’fight for control: the failure of the united states to protect against international child abduction.” women’s rights reporter 21:129-138.
schepard, a. (1985). “taking children seriously: promoting cooperative custody after divorce.” texas law review 64:687-788.
Child Custody, Sexual Behaviour and the Law
Child Custody
See Also
Child Support; Divorce
Leave a Reply